Painful Operations: Removing Bladder Stones before Anesthesia


If you visit the Gordon Museum at Guy’s Hospital in London, you’ll see a small bladder stone—no bigger than 3 centimetres across. Besides the fact that it has been sliced open to reveal concentric circles within, it is entirely unremarkable in appearance. Yet, this tiny stone was the source of enormous pain for 53-year-old Stephen Pollard, who agreed to undergo surgery to remove it in 1828.

People frequently suffered from bladder stones in earlier periods due to poor diet, which often consisted of lots of meat and alcohol, and very few vegetables. The oldest bladder stone on record was discovered in Egyptian grave from 4,800 B.C. The problem was so common that itinerant healers traveled from village to village offering a vast array of services and potions that promised to cure those suffering from the condition. Depending on the size of these stones, they could block the flow of urine into the bladder from the kidneys; or, they could prevent the flow of urine out of the bladder through the urethra. Either situation was potentially lethal. In the first instance, the kidney is slowly destroyed by pressure from the urine; in the second instance, the bladder swells and eventually bursts, leading to infection and finally death.

2Like today, bladder stones were unimaginably painful for those who suffered from them in the past. The stones themselves were often enormous. Some measured as large as a tennis ball. The afflicted often acted in desperation, going to great lengths to rid themselves of the agony. In the early 18th century, one man reportedly drove a nail through his penis and then used a blacksmith’s hammer to break the stone apart until the pieces were small enough to pass through his urethra. It’s not a surprise, then, that many sufferers chose to submit to the surgeon’s knife despite a very real risk of dying during or immediately after the procedure from shock or infection. Although the operation itself lasted only a matter of minutes, lithotomic procedures were incredibly painful and dangerous—not to mention humiliating.

The patient—naked from the waist down—was bound in such a way as to ensure an unobstructed view of his genitals and anus [see illustration below]. Afterwards, the surgeon passed a curved, metal tube up the patient’s penis and into the bladder. He then slid a finger into the man’s rectum, feeling for the stone. Once he had located it, his assistant removed the metal tube and replaced it with a wooden staff. This staff acted as a guide so that the surgeon did not fatally rupture the patient’s rectum or intestines as he began cutting deeper into the bladder. Once the staff was in place, the surgeon cut diagonally through the fibrous muscle of the scrotum until he reached the wooden staff. Next, he used a probe to widen the hole, ripping open the prostate gland in the process. At this point, the wooden staff was removed and the surgeon used forceps to extract the stone from the bladder. [1]

L0015225 Lithotomy scene

Unfortunately for Stephen Pollard, what should have lasted 5 minutes ended up lasting 55 minutes under the gaze of 200 spectators at Guy’s Hospital in London. The surgeon Bransby Cooper fumbled and panicked, cursing the patient loudly for having “a very deep perineum,” while the patient, in turn, cried: “Oh! let it go; —pray, let it keep in!’” The surgeon reportedly used every tool at his disposal before he finally reached into the gaping wound with his bare fingers. During this time, several of the spectators walked out of the operating theater, unable to bear witness to the patient’s agony any longer. Eventually, Cooper located the stone with a pair of forceps. He held it up for his audience, who clapped unenthusiastically at the sight of the stone.

Sadly, Pollard survived the surgery only to die the next day. His autopsy revealed that it was indeed the skill of his surgeon, and not his alleged “abnormal anatomy,” which was the cause of his death.

1200px-Thomas_Wakley72But the story didn’t end there. Word quickly got out about the botched operation. When Thomas Wakley [left]—the editor of The Lancet—heard of this medical disaster, he accused Cooper of incompetence and implied that the surgeon had only been appointed to Guy’s Hospital because he was nephew to one of the senior surgeons on staff. Wakley used the trial to attack what he believed to be corruption within the hospitals due to rampant nepotism. Outraged by the allegation, Cooper sued Wakley for libel and sought £2000 in damages. The jury reluctantly sided with the surgeon, but only awarded him £100. Wakley had raised more than that in a defence fund campaign and gave the remaining money over to Pollard’s widow after the trial. [2]

Bransby Cooper’s reputation, like his patient, never did recover.

If you’re interested in the history of pre-anesthetic and pre-antiseptic surgery, you can pre-order my book The Butchering Art in the US (click here) and in the UK (click here). Information of foreign editions to come!


1. Druin Burch, Digging up the Dead: Uncovering the Life and Times of an Extraordinary Surgeon (2007), p. 26. I am greatly indebted to his work for bringing this story to my attention.
2. Thomas Wakley, A Report of the Trial of Cooper v. Wakley (1829), pp. 4-5.

By | 2017-05-29T14:28:30+00:00 May 29th, 2017|Casebooks|13 Comments


  1. Em May 29, 2017 at 2:51 pm - Reply

    Y’ouch! I read this with my legs crossed! Thanks for an interesting read ?

  2. Connie Rae May 29, 2017 at 3:51 pm - Reply

    I ordered The Butchering Art, but after reading this article, may be sorry. ‘’;o) Call me tomorrow about 3 PM your time, if you can. Just would like to see/talk with you. Love, Mom

  3. ssingularityy May 29, 2017 at 5:30 pm - Reply

    Very interesting article! As a female who had experienced the agony of a kidney stone, I’m grateful that I had the luxury of modern medicine to help me out! As this article only discussed removing stones from men, is there any evidence/information on how premodern surgeons operated on women?

  4. Greg May 29, 2017 at 7:15 pm - Reply

    Lindsey, I so look forward to reading your book. I have pre ordered it, since October of ’16.

    • The Chirurgeon's Apprentice May 29, 2017 at 7:29 pm - Reply

      That’s so kind of you, Greg! Thank you for pre-ordering. I hope you enjoy it when it’s finally released. I’m nervous!

  5. herbsvschemicals May 29, 2017 at 7:35 pm - Reply

    We here at herbsvschemicals are interested in the history of medicine and herbs. It is great knowledge for our blog and the insight is invaluable. Thanks for the history and a truly reflective site.

  6. herbsvschemicals May 29, 2017 at 7:37 pm - Reply

    We will follow your site to keep up with valuable history.

  7. coldhandboyack May 30, 2017 at 3:33 am - Reply


  8. Tim May 30, 2017 at 5:24 am - Reply

    Having suffered 4 times with kidney stones, I cant imagine what those poor people back then felt….God bless medicine. Hiya Lindsey, Not sure if u remember me but I wrote u a couple months back about getting the book autographed. So looking forward to reading it!! Tim

  9. DANIEL GERALD LEARY May 30, 2017 at 2:51 pm - Reply

    Among the bigger lies told to me in my life, was, in the ER, due to a bleeding from my penis, caused by rough passage of a kidney stone, the PA, before inserting a catheter, stated, “This won’t hurt at all.”

  10. […] Painful Operations: Removing Bladder Stones before Anesthesia […]

  11. Jane Woods February 22, 2019 at 11:39 am - Reply

    If you haven’t had a kidney stone, you likely know someone who has. Kidney stones affect one in 11 people in the United States. Overall, about 19 percent of men and 9 percent of women in the United States will develop a kidney stone by the time they are 70 years old. Whether you’ve passed a kidney stone on your own, have undergone a procedure to remove or break one up, or you’ve never had one before, there are things you can do that help prevent new stones from forming. You can also refer to this article which states all the necessary details about kidney stones

Leave A Comment