Dead Men’s Eyes: A History of Optography


Aurora, Illinois. 16 February 1914. It was a cold, wintery night when Theresa Hollander’s father discovered her broken and bloodied body near a shed in St. Nicholas’s Cemetery. The 20-year-old (pictured below) had been brutally beaten to death with a wooden club, which had been discarded along with the girl’s corpse amongst the tombstones. Much to her father’s horror, Theresa’s eyes were wide open, her hands clutched in frozen agony.

Opt3Suspicion fell immediately onto the girl’s former boyfriend, Anthony Petras, who vehemently denied being involved in Theresa’s murder. A little over a week later, newspapers around the country began reporting that the corpse’s eyeball had been removed and photographed in the hopes that the image of her slayer could be retrieved from her retina. According to The Washington Times (25 February 1914):

The picture was taken at the suggestion of a local oculist, who told police that the retina would show the last object within her vision before she became unconscious. The photograph is held by the accusers of Anthony Petras. It will be shown to the grand jury which meets Saturday.

For hundreds of years, people had wondered whether it might be possible to capture an image of our last vision at the point of death. The idea was first put forward in the 17th century by a Jesuit friar named Christopher Schiener, who claimed to observe a faint image on the retina of a frog he had been dissecting. [1] It wasn’t until the invention of photography in the 1840s, however, that “optography” emerged as a scientific pursuit. It reached the height of popularity in the last decades of the 19th century after the German physiologist, Wilhelm Kuhne, devised a process in 1878 which he believed helped to preserve details from the retina of the eye.

Kuhne believed that the primary process behind vision was chemical, and that the retina worked like a photographic plate from which crucial information could be retrieved after death. His “optograms” exploited the retinal substance, rhodopsin, which bleaches when exposed to light through a crystalline lens. He demonstrated his process by reproducing what appeared to be the pattern of crossbars over a window (below) on the retina of a dead rabbit.

An albino rabbit, after being kept 15 min. in the dark, was decapitated; one eye was removed from the head under sodium light…and fastened onto the edge of a cork by means of needles…[The eye was placed in a] dark chamber with the cornea pressing softly against the diaphragm. The image was visible on the sclerotic, on one side of the optic nerve…that I was sure that it fell on the more deeply coloured division of the retina and could readily mark its place in the appropriate quadrant. Thereupon the yellow curtain was removed from the pane and the eye after five minutes’ exposure was taken away, divided along the equator and examined in feeble gaslight….I brought the preparation out into darkened daylight and shewed it to several witnesses. There was evident on the retina a most distinct brighter diffused spot, the small dimension of which corresponded to those of the image previously seen by me, and the position of which made me already sure that it was the optogram. [2]

Kuhne was satisfied with the results, but wanted to try his experiment on a human subject next. His opportunity arose in 1880, when a man named Erhard Gustav Reif was sentenced to death by guillotine after drowning his two young sons in the river. The eager scientist immediately retrieved the murderer’s decapitated head, removed the eyeballs, and reported seeing “violent and disturbing movements” on the dead man’s retina. The ambiguity of these images was attributed to the fact that the prisoner was wearing a blindfold at the moment of his death. Kuhne’s sketch of what he saw still survives. [3]

Other similar experiments were carried out in the 1880s and 1890s. It was even suggested that an optogram should be produced from the eye of Mary Jane Kelly, one of Jack the Ripper’s victims, though it’s unclear whether the procedure was actually carried out. The idea that optography might have forensic potential was later popularized by the science fiction writer, Jules Verne, in Les Frères Kip (1902). Indeed, so widespread was the idea, that some murderers even went to great lengths to destroy their victims’ eyeballs, as in the case of Constable P.C. Gutteridge in 1927:

In the early hours of September 27, 1927, occurred a crime that shocked England with its brutality…In the very act of doing his duty Constable P.C. Gutteridge of the Essex constabulary was shot down. He was found by the roadside with four bullet wounds in his head, each fired from a distance of about ten inches. A shot had been fired through each eye, and it was believed by some at the time that the murderer had done this out of superstition. There is an old belief that a picture of the murderer is imprinted in the victim’s eyes. [4]

Ultimately, optography fell from fashion due, in part, to the impracticalities of processing retinal images. The last serious scientific attempt at retrieving images from retinas took place in 1975 when police in Heidelberg, Germany, invited the physiologist, Evangelos Alexandridis, to repeat Kuhne’s experiments in order to determine whether or not optograms could be used in forensic investigations. The scientist placed anesthetized rabbits in front of “panels bearing high-contrast patterns or images (one of which was a portrait of Salvador Dali) before being killed.” [5] The retinal images were then photographed, some of which can be seen below from the Museum of Optography.

But what of Illinois murder victim Theresa Hollander? Unsurprisingly, the removal of her eyeball and the subsequent photograph revealed nothing that would help the case against her ex-boyfriend. Petras was tried not once, but twice, and found not guilty on both occasions. He maintainted his innocence till his death.

The exact circumstances of Theresa’s murder remain a mystery to this day.

If you enjoy reading my articles, please consider supporting my blog by clicking HERE.

1. Derek Ogbourne, “Optography and Optograms.” Available online. I am hugely indebted to Ogbourne’s work for this article.
2. Kühne, W, 1878, On the Photochemistry of the Retina and on Visual Purple, (trans. by Michael Foster).
3. Michael J. Aminoff and Robert B. Daroff, Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences, p. 813.
4. Richard Harrison, Scotland Yard (1948), p. 74.
5. Ogbourne, “Optography.”

By | 2015-09-09T13:00:58+00:00 September 9th, 2015|Casebooks|18 Comments


  1. ft2hill September 9, 2015 at 1:42 pm - Reply

    Good read. Very interesting stuff you must work a lot of hours reading and collecting info god bless you keep up the great work

  2. coldhandboyack September 9, 2015 at 2:23 pm - Reply

    Great stuff once again.

  3. Sharlene Spingler September 9, 2015 at 2:31 pm - Reply

    You may wish to contact Dr. burns of the Burns Archive on 48th Street in Manhattan. He is a senior individual, who is a surgeon and eye doctor, who has the world’s most archival collection of medical photographs ranging over 2 centuries. He also consulted on the TV series The Nick, about the turn of the century NYC hospital, surgery, disease etc. It was wonderful.

  4. carolynloyel September 9, 2015 at 4:21 pm - Reply

    Love this! I never knew about the subject. Imagine if we really did keep an image of our last moments on our retina. I bet all the people who die during a sexual affair would be REALLY worried about that! Haha.

  5. carolynloyel September 9, 2015 at 4:22 pm - Reply

    Love this! I never knew about any of this stuff 🙂

  6. Joseph Connelly September 9, 2015 at 5:47 pm - Reply

    Dear Doctor,

    Wonderfully thought provoking article as always. Almost immediately I thought of how I had heard of optography before. Then it occurred to me that one of my favorite tv shows had touched uponthis subject. I quickly searched online, and yes, the Sci Fi show Fringe had done so. Here is a bit from Wikipedia from their post about optography. They had a number of other references as well which I’ll look forward to exploring now that you’ve piqued my interest.

    In the 2008 series Fringe (“The Same Old Story”, season 1 episode 2), Walter uses an optographic image taken from the optic nerve of a woman killed whilst under the effect of a paralytic toxin to track down and arrest her murderer.

    Thank you!

    Warmest wishes,


  7. Zdeno September 10, 2015 at 6:27 am - Reply

    Great article. Thank you!

  8. nicole September 10, 2015 at 10:01 am - Reply

    I actually came across this article doing some other research ages ago. So fantastic to hear more behind it!

  9. Mike Chorost September 11, 2015 at 2:21 pm - Reply

    There is a haunting short story by James Blish, “Tomb Tapper,” that uses this idea, but updated in that the investigators try to read the last thoughts on the deceased’s mind. Also, I’m skeptical that this would work, because eyes saccade — that is, they constantly move, so that there would rarely be a single image fixed on one place in the retina.

    • Sharlene Spingler September 11, 2015 at 6:14 pm - Reply

      Just like the one that I heard of the tradition of literature of utterances from the mouths of those beheaded on the Guillotine at the moment of severance. Nice idea but impossible as the head is separated from the means of producing sound.

  10. The Weekly Index: 11th September 2015 September 11, 2015 at 4:45 pm - Reply

    […] ♦ Dead men’s eyes, the strange history of optography. […]

  11. Icy Sedgwick September 19, 2015 at 2:12 pm - Reply

    Dario Argento explored this idea in ‘Four Flies on Gray Velvet’. Amazing how tenacious it is as a belief!

  12. […] of sight. History of optography: images from retinas of the dead. Fascinating story, by Lindsey Fitzharris. Read of the […]

  13. Yumna September 30, 2015 at 3:08 pm - Reply

    Reblogged this on VINTAGE STUDENT.

  14. Back surgery February 10, 2016 at 1:08 pm - Reply

    I enjoy reading your article. Thank you for posting this.

  15. […] Dead Men’s Eyes: A History of Optography   […]

  16. […] Dead Men’s Eyes: A History of Optography […]

Leave A Comment